
Choices
Standards from all sources say that we should give patients choices. Further, in order for patients to give informed consent, we need to lay out the choices with risks as well as benefits, prognosis, and finally costs. It’s become standard practice to begin by saying “We could do nothing, but that means….blah, blah.” Then, listing the choices of treatments or materials and telling people why one costs more than the other. See the QCS Treatment Planning policy and Procedure for guidance on this.
What we are not very good at is telling patients how vulnerable or fragile these treatments are. It is like we are embarrassed about admitting that some things we do are not going to last forever. However, it is a brutal fact that they don’t, and unfortunately this is information that would be useful to patients.
Honesty pays off
Many patients actually wish to make decisions based on cost effectiveness. This means that some may choose the cheaper option for fillings, even if the life is shorter or the result not so aesthetically pleasing. On the other hand, some may choose to lose a tooth and have a nice implant replacement because we know that an implant has a better prognosis than an endodontic re-treatment.
Either way, people really appreciate honesty in the information we give. On one hand they are more likely to return when we give full disclosure. On the other hand, they are less likely to be grumpy if they find out later that the treatment they had was only going to last a few years. Nothing we do in dentistry can be taken as permanent.