Care Quality Commission Archives | QCS

Care Quality Commission

Under the Single Assessment Framework scoring used to be at evidence category level, and this was used to come to a score for each Quality Statement, and then each Quality Statement score was used to come to a rating for each Key Question and then ultimately the overall rating for the service.

With up to 6 evidence categories and 34 Quality Statements there could have been up to 204 scores used to come to a judgement. It has been agreed that this system was far too complicated, difficult to understand for both CQC and providers use and didn’t provide a fair or robust judgement of services.

As such, from December 2024 CQC scrapped the use of evidence categories to come to a judgement on a Quality Statement and have reverted to using inspectors’ professional skills and knowledge to assess a wide range of evidence to come to a score for a Quality Statement, without allocating it to an evidence category.

However, this has caused a problem for CQC as their IT system was built to use the scores allocated to evidence categories to produce a score for a Quality Statement. As such CQC have had to develop a ‘workaround’ while the technology is adapted to allow scores to be independently given at Quality Statement level.

This ‘workaround’ essentially means that the score given to the Quality Statement must be given to an evidence category – so every evidence category score will just be the same as the Score the Inspector has allocated to the Quality Statement. You just need to ignore the scoring given at evidence category level, as it will always be led by the score the inspector has already given at Quality Statements level.

Finally in draft reports you may see reference to the fact that scores have been ‘moderated’, again this is nothing to worry about, and is purely another IT legacy issue to allow inspectors to allocate a score to a Quality Statement that reflects their professional judgement rather than the narrow, process driven way that the current IT system dictates.

This will be temporary until the IT system is fixed. It is frustrating for you and them and is the result of investing in an IT system that wasn’t tested in practical terms and isn’t responsive to rapid changes in the ways inspections are conducted, and reports are published.

Filter Posts:

What you need to know about CQC changes to scoring

June 16, 2025
Read more
The Care Social – Episode 14 Managing Fallout from a Regulatory Inspection

The Care Social Podcast Ep14: Managing Fallout from a Regulatory Inspection

May 27, 2025
In this episode of The Care Social, we explore how care providers can effectively respond after a regulatory downgrade — a growing concern in light of recent CQC developments.
Read more

Listen now: How to recruit and retain staff in social care 

February 25, 2025
Read more

CQC Single Assessment Framework Under Fire – Hear the Key Findings on The Care Social Podcast

February 18, 2025
Read more

CQC Ratings ‘Untrustworthy’ – Hear the Fallout on The Care Social Podcast

February 11, 2025
Read more

State of Care 2023/24: What does this mean for adult social care?

October 25, 2024
Read more

How to improve your CQC rating blog and checklist

December 19, 2023
Improving your quality rating from CQC is a real achievement for any registered manager. With the rollout of the new Single Assessment Framework and the focus on evidence, here are…
Read more
placeholder Image

Webinar Catchup: The New CQC Single Assessment Framework: What do I need to know?

October 28, 2022
With the CQC well on their way to the full roll-out of a new CQC single assessment framework, Ed Watkinson, Residential Care & Inspection Specialist, discusses what the changes will…
Read more