Legislation Archives | Page 2 of 4 | QCS

Legislation

Filter Posts:

E-cigarettes and the Workplace

June 24, 2016
Use of E-cigarettes or ‘Vaping’ is becoming commonplace in Britain. Surprisingly, the use of e-cigarettes in a public space is not caught by the ban on smoking on the basis…
Read more

Can a dress code policy which restricts the wearing of religious dress be discriminatory?

June 11, 2016
An employer’s neutral dress code policy prohibiting the wearing of any visible symbol of political, philosophical or religious belief has been held, in the recent ECJ judgment in Achbita and…
Read more

Indirect Discrimination – When will there be a provision, criterion or practice?

June 4, 2016
It can be sometimes very difficult to determine whether the actions of an employer amount to a provision, criteria or practice which can then run the risk of resulting in…
Read more

Indirect Religion or Belief Discrimination

May 28, 2016
An issue that has recently been considered in the Employment Appeal Tribunal concerns whether or not the dismissal of a teacher for refusing to leave her husband who is a…
Read more
placeholder Image

Monitoring an employee’s emails and the right to privacy

May 22, 2016
In January this year (see “Monitoring employees’ use of the internet – the reality” from 31st January 2016 for the details) we reported on the European Court of Human Rights…
Read more

Does disciplinary action amount to discrimination?

April 22, 2016
The issue of discrimination in employment is often a tricky subject, and employers should always be aware of the potential implications of their conduct in respect of the ways in…
Read more
placeholder Image

A language issue

February 7, 2016
In the case of Kelly v Covance Laboratories Limited, the employment appeal tribunal held that an instruction to an employee not to speak their native language at work was not…
Read more

Monitoring employees’ use of the internet – the reality

January 31, 2016
In Barbulescu v Romania the European Court of Human Rights decided an important case on privacy of personal communications at work. Contrary to recent media coverage, this case does not allow free rein for…
Read more